Wednesday, January 19, 2011

Our Time in the Sun


Life is short, but it's also wide.

Now, in the midst of a career change, I've had no choice but to tackle the next question without flinching: How should I choose to live my life? Should my aim be on altruism? Should I focus on prestige? How about adventure? Or acquiring knowledge? What about making a lot of money? What about purchasing a house? Should I just unfurl my sails and let the winds take me as they please? Or should I postpone simple pleasures and lay foundations for a family instead? There doesn't seem to be a definite answer, but one thing sure is clear: school didn't prepare me for this shit.

In the confusion, I look to others around me - how did they decide? Computer programmers, logistics coordinators, bartenders, account executives, theater actors, public accountants, investment bankers, medical malpractice lawyers, audio visual technicians, automobile mechanics, mobile phone salesmen, etc. They chose, but did they place these career decisions against the greater backdrop of life itself when choosing? Or did they (and I) base their decisions on much less profound considerations? I think so.

We choose as if we will live forever.

Here is the meat of my point: If this life is our only shot at existence; if after death there is nothing; if there will never be anything again for you and for me; if this is our only time in the sun, then, shouldn't we give a little more thought to the question of how we should spend our lives? Imagine a hypothetical situation: You die and you are told that you have 24 hours to reflect on your life (albeit in perhaps a gaseous, ethereal form). You are also told that once the 24 hours are up, you're done: your consciousness is erased. Forever. So while you're there floating and torturing yourself for the next 24 hours, would you think of better ways you could have spent your life? Would regret rear its ugly head? Of course it would. For example: "Damn, I knew I should have said 'yes' to that threesome at 22." We'd be a pretty pissed off bunch of gasses for our last 24 hours. Well, gather 'round, my dear fleeting gasses, and contemplate the following 2 cheery excerpts on the topic:

You live as if you were destined to live forever, no thought of your frailty ever enters your head, of how much time has already gone by you take no heed. You squander time as if you drew from a full and abundant supply, though all the while that day which you bestow on some person or thing is perhaps your last. You have all the fears of mortals and all the desires of immortals. You will hear many men saying: "After my fiftieth year I shall retire into leisure, my sixtieth year shall release me from public duties." And what guarantee, pray, have you that your life will last as long?

But when at last some infirmity has reminded [old men] of their mortality, in what terror do they die, feeling that they are being dragged out of life, and not merely leaving it. They cry out that they have been fools, because they have not really lived, and that they will live henceforth in leisure if only they escape from this illness; then at last they reflect how uselessly they have striven for things which they did not enjoy, and how all their toil has gone for nothing.

- Seneca, On the Shortness of Life

If we were absolutely certain that there was no afterlife and that what awaits us after death is the same as what we experienced before life (i.e. nothing) would we lead our lives differently today? Would we choose our careers differently? Or would we just say "fuck it," avoid futile contemplation of this behemothic issue, sidestep it altogether, and become discount mattress salesmen? At least we'd have "employee of the month" awards to look forward to.

My refusal to avoid sidestepping this question has led me to the intriguing field of positive psychology: the scientific study of happiness, human flourishing, and the search for meaning. This is what I've been spending a considerable amount of time researching these days. After all, can you think of a more significant matter of concern than the maximization of happiness, or better yet, the study of how to best appreciate our brief time in the spotlight of existence? The premise of this new branch of psychology is that certain "things" (i.e. emotions, activities, pursuits, ideas, institutions) provide us with more lasting happiness than other "things." So essentially, we can scientifically prove where, or from what, we procure the most lasting happiness. We can scientifically suggest what is most worth pursuing in this life. Perhaps positive psychology can then provide a few solid answers to this post's opening question. I'm looking, I'm looking...

There is no right or wrong here. I'm just as ignorant as we all are on this issue. This is just something I believe is worth contemplating for you and for me. And if you're a discount mattress salesman, drop me a line with your contact info - I'm in the market. Good luck.

5 comments:

  1. Paradoxical, this one is. Is Positive Psychology your settling point or beginning point? or pivot? It seems like your active actions are not merely choices; rather, you view them as your life being defined. Correct me if I'm wrong. It seems as though your meditation experience allowed you to metamorphasize, and not just in an intransitive sense, but in a sense that once you got there you propelled.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous21.1.11

    Who says we were put on this earth to be happy; it seems to me that perhaps this is a very modern and western viewpoint, perhaps those who live in barren lands in Siberia, for example, do not spend the same time and energy pursuing happiness?

    Also haven't some studies concluded that we basically have a "base" level of happiness, that once someone loses a limb or wins the lottery they ultimately return to their predisposed level of happiness? Therefore trying to maximize it may be futile?

    Plus you seem to base your jumping off points on a certainty that there is nothing before or after life/death...but what if there is? I mean, for this to be a valid scientific viewpoint, surely one would need to scientifically investigate all the world's religions? For instance, I am not a Christian, however I fear that if I did some solid research into it, that I may feel compelled to become one, based on the abundance of credible historical evidence, though of course at the end one takes a leap of faith. Same with all world religions - there could potentially be truth in all of them, so how can we discount all that before choosing how to live? Did the experience of meditation, though I know it can be secular, not open up thoughts about spirituality for you?

    I'm just playing devil's advocate here - jumping into conversations like these is much better over a beer! But I am enjoying your blog, keep it up and good luck!

    p.s. I know there's a bunch of garbage in it, but have you watched "What the bleep do you know?" - I'd be curious on your thoughts regarding quantum physics and so on....

    ReplyDelete
  3. J: I don't know if positive psychology is the beginning or the end. The future is always uncertain no matter how hard we try to control it. We will see :)

    Anon: As part of the animal kingdom, I feel we have as much purpose on this earth as the common house fly. There is no evidence to suggest otherwise. Thus happiness is not the purpose, but given that we have the capacity for it, and granted that survival and reproduction are easily accessible in our society, pursuing happiness seems like a good use of our time...

    No one knows whether there is an afterlife. So should we spend our life behaving as if there is one? All religions require a "leap of faith" sooner or later, usually when it comes to discussing the afterlife. Given the little we know, it may be wiser to entertain the most probable outcome: nothingness. Though not directly apparent, I feel there are many benefits to this viewpoint. Maybe a good topic for a post?

    Meditation granted me a deeper understanding of human nature. If I had chosen to, I could have attached that understanding to numerous available religious beliefs and have emerged with a more spiritual interpretation. The more complex point is, interpretations of our lives are independent of external factors (such as religion), they depend on us - our minds. Thanks for the insightful comment.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous22.1.11

    loved Seneca's letters from a Stoic.

    Right up there with Aurelius' Meditations.

    Both great books

    ReplyDelete
  5. That excerpt from Seneca speaks volumes to me. I wonder about these things on a daily basis (yeah you should've gone for the 3-some).

    I hinted at a similar concept today by linking to a TedTalk by statistician Nic Marks. He asks "why we measure a nation's success by its productivity -- instead of by the happiness and well-being of its people" (full talk here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M1o3FS0awtk)

    I was faced with a similar question 6 months ago. I was about to graduate with my Master's Degree. High off renegade thinkers like Robert Kiyosaki and Tim Ferriss, I'd built a business for 2 years during Grad School that now allowed me the option of flipping the bird to traditional employers.

    I quickly found myself being alienated in not just physically but also socially. What do you do when you no longer have work as an excuse that takes up the majority of your day. What do you do when 2 hours per day is all the work needed to survive. What do you do with the rest?

    It became doubly difficult as I realized my value system equated time on the job with productivity rather than results (not linked to time) with productivity. Even though I got results, I spent so little time to get it, I almost feel like I needed to invent bullshit to feel worthy of said results.

    I'm still working on that. It forces me to think about the impact on the world I wish to have and how I wish to change it.

    "It is only when we have nothing that we are free to have anything" - Tyler Durden - Fight Club

    ReplyDelete